I voted for my team, cause i think I have the most solid RBs (D.Davis, K.Jones, Rudi, Corey, and Foster) and a Top QB (Culpepper), which in our league thats what you need. My WRs are serviceable, and should put up average stats, but no WR can score anywhere near what a RB can and NO RB can score anywhere near what a QB can, so i think my teams the tits. I think if Jamal isn't hurt as much as everyone says he is, and he gets paid, Kevin might have the best 2 "starting" RBs, and Ergle has a solid RB tandem, Morris has the best starting WR's and Jamie has the potential for better starting WR's, paul has a risky 2 RBs in Holmes and McGahee which could pan out to be brilliant, but all in all as of this very minute i like my teams chances better than everyone elses teams.
__________________
"When you lose a few times it makes you see how hard it really is to win" - Yogi Berra
I voted paul's team. Not even close if Holmes is healthy, and i'm sure he will be for 7 games. McNabb can outscore culp and manning on many sunday's. IF i were voting for 15 game season, Paul would be a little more shaky.
The coon cobs can't be topped at QB, or starting WR. Unfortunately the RB's are questionable.
I, after having played this for awhile, have come to the conclusion that the only thing that really matters is who you happen to be playing in a given week. For example, in previous years, ergle has been allergic to scoring points most of the time. So if someone happens to be playing ergle on the day when he has his highest pt total of the season, and loses to ergle and ALSO has a game or two where they could've beaten ergle that week (when ergle scores his usual 35 pts), but happened to be playing jamie who scored 100 gazillion, thats a friggin 2 game swing right there. Its all luck, in other words.
After 3 weeks, I can tell you without any doubt that my team is the worst collection of deadbeats, lowlifes, and slackers ever combined into one fantasy roster.